19 November 2025 | Wednesday | Opinion | By By Cem Zorlular, CEO, Er-Kim
In these diverse and dynamic markets, adaptation is not a strategy; it is a prerequisite for thriving. Success requires a fundamental shift in mindset: walking away is rarely an option, and profitability depends on establishing a hyper-agile operating model designed to thrive within constant change.
This distinction – between treating change as an anomaly and embracing it as a constant - is crucial, not just for operational managers, but for every biopharma boardroom charting a global strategy. When operating in regions like Emerging EMEA, we aren’t just navigating disruption; we have been forced to build a resilience playbook that is now essential for every international company aiming to thrive globally.
Shift from Risk Avoidance to Risk Intelligence
Boards often view Emerging EMEA through the lens of risk avoidance, treating every political or economic change as a reason they may delay investment. This hesitancy is often rooted in the belief that they must defer judgment until there is greater clarity or visibility – waiting for currency to stabilize or the political landscape to settle. The core problem is that in these markets, that perfect visibility will not arrive. Volatility and chronic change are the base case operating principles. Adopting this reality is crucial, as delay doesn’t eliminate risk; it simply results in missed revenue opportunities and, more importantly, delays patient access.
Instead of solely focusing on risk avoidance, leadership should embrace risk intelligence. This could mean moving beyond standard country risk ratings and investing in and building a bespoke operational capability for international markets. This specialized unit must function as a unique, hyper-agile appendage of the core business – one that is both deeply aligned with corporate standards yet distinctly structured to operate on local terms. The mandate should be simple: develop comprehensive scenario planning (Plans A, B, and C) that anticipates chronic change. The focus then shifts from trying to prevent risk to building the operational agility required to profit despite market volatility. The boardroom conversation, therefore, should move from "Is the risk too high?" to "What systems do we have in place to execute Plan B immediately when market conditions trigger it?"
The Power of Neutrality: Reframing Change
An important step for navigating this volatile landscape is to change the way your organization thinks about change itself. It’s easy to react to policy shifts, regulatory surprises, or even geopolitical conflict with frustration or paralysis. The reality is, every single disruptive event simultaneously presents both risks and specific opportunities. However, if we accept that change is an inherent constant, we can remove the negative emotional response.
Companies should look to adopt a position of neutrality towards change. Yes, some events—like war—are inherently negative, but when most countries shift policies, they are doing so with an intent to improve, or at least a belief that the change could be good. Change, in and of itself, is just change. It is not something we can usually impact, but it is always something we must adapt to.
When an organization accepts this fundamental principle, teams stop reacting to disruption with an "ugh" and start approaching it with an anticipation of opportunity. This philosophical shift is the first step toward genuine organizational flexibility.
The Localization Playbook: Building True Resilience
Even with their inherent volatility, these emerging markets make strategic sense. When you consider the sheer number of countries and the overall revenue opportunity they represent—especially for rare and specialty disease therapies—they cannot be ignored. The question is not if to enter, but how to build a strategy that won’t buckle under pressure.
The fragmented, volatile nature of Emerging EMEA has driven companies into partnerships to create a localization playbook. This playbook can be used as a blueprint for global resilience.
For a large biopharma machine, the concept of infrastructure often equates to scale: vast manufacturing might, global logistics pipelines, and the financial power to absorb costs and compete purely on price. Their approach is often a “brute force” strategy—pushing product everywhere and slashing prices to overcome market hurdles.
This may not be the most intelligent launch required for small to mid-size biotech firms. For a smaller company, infrastructure is defined by depth and flexibility, not scale.
Redefining Infrastructure for the Intelligent Launch
To succeed in some of the most challenging markets, small to mid-sized biotechs must look at a deeper, targeted investment. To be successful, these firms must go into local commercial infrastructure, not just centralized manufacturing. This is what creates true resilience and secures patient access when centralized, global models inevitably fail.
For a smaller biotech, "infrastructure" means:
By building flexible teams and localized systems, specialty biopharma partners are positioned to execute an intelligent launch. When a supply chain shock or a new policy decision hits, we don't have to wait for a command from a distant HQ. We have the cultural context, the local authority, and the pre-approved alternatives to adapt quickly—securing the consistent drug supply that small, critical patient populations depend on.
The ability to successfully navigate the high-stakes, high-volatility environment inherent to regions like Emerging EMEA is no longer just a regional specialty; it is the ultimate competitive advantage for any biopharma company looking to thrive and find sustained growth globally.
© 2025 Biopharma Boardroom. All Rights Reserved.